SAY THIS: When a Microsoft Biometrics Lobbyist Tries to Massage Army Led Mass Surveillance.

Dear Senator Schatz,

This is my response to news that you are leading up biometric legislation in the US Senate.

 As a former military dependent, I made a solemn promise to myself as a civilian, with no current relationship to the rules, protocols of the US military, I would never consent to militarized collection of my identity.  As the Senator of Hawaii, you must understand the amount of veterans and military household members quartered throughout your US island annex. Not all of them are there because they consented to being there.

I respect the position the US military, but there are [legal] limits to their domain and projected dominance. We know there are firms who will lobby you until every dime become a military dollar and every American becomes identified as an asset of the United States military.  I'm not as worried about them as I am the people who will protect the corrupt involved with obstructing a civilian's right to object to BIMA's collection of a US citizen civilian's biometrics under a trade transfer agreement.

The US Army is the patent holder for all US derivative biometric technology. If China and Russia are collecting US biometrics for their purposes - that is a possible patent violation and a threat to the personal rights of any identified US citizen. While this is noteworthy, it is not the main point of my communication here.

I, like all American citizens, may legally demand a stop and deletion today of the US Army's collection of my biometrics if/when it is collected without express consent by Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple or any other commercial derivative provider of choice.

There are lobbyists who do not know that efforts to codify a legal obstruction to the Privacy Act of 1974 is an unenforceable attempt at lawmaking. I know because they have tried in my current state of residence, WA State. Kings of government trade transfer license rights are going to lose because they have lost cases to the Privacy Act. These cases concerned covert mass surveillance operations, whose vendors made attempts to hide behind an NDA in the courts. I urge you to stop entertaining these lobbyists. Inform your colleagues. Protect US citizens’ rights to deny the federal government nonexempt surveillance without a warrant or other legitimate government purpose.

BIMA may own the license, but the US Citizen owns themself.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]

Politicized Social Media Platforms [or Why I Dumped Twitter]

“Some” social media accounts are more American than US citizens?

By Sheila Dean

On October 18th, 2017 Twitter joined a small league of American social media companies who decided to monitor naturalized US citizens.  In 2013, Twitter distanced itself from National Security agencies, denouncing NSA PRISM program surveillance of its social media accounts.  So what changed? 

Come to think of it, not much has changed at all. We should readily realize virtually no single social media platform or US media company has consistent integrity conforming to US public Constitutional protections. The general rule is if you have to agree to a Terms of Service agreement to do anything online you are paying with your private data; which may used with or without your consent.

For instance, Comcast believes it has the right to demand the last four of your SSN#. If they never overtly asked you for permission to use the last-4 of your Social Security Number via a customer service rep in the Philippines or Latin America; they have zero right to ask you for it for account verification purposes. If a company asks for the last 4 of your SSN and you never gave it to them in the first place for credit approvals, treat it like a phishing attack.  Hang up the phone and visit a store in person to administrate your account.  

Companies may ask for verification of identity, but they never have the right to use your personal information without your permission. There has to be a specific purpose for the use of your information. For that purpose, they need documented consent. They’re not in a position to really make demands for government mandated identity.

The SSN# is especially sensitive information. It is even more so now due to the Equifax breach. You can ask for a passcode or 2-factor authentication number to be generated for your online accounts.  I have also included an example letter to  help request your SSN removal for customer authorization purposes at the end of this blog. 

CONVENIENCE VS. PERSONAL SOVEREIGNTY

You are in the drivers seat.  If convenience is more important than privacy - keep doing what you’re doing. Just know you are developing media companies’ private data sales kiosk of You; which they do in fact readily sell to any paying government customer who will purchase your information. Media companies like Twitter and Xfinity aren’t picky.

When DHS or the NSA won’t obey US agency legal compliance, neither will media companies.  You can enter in a civil suit to sue both.  You might lose; but you also might win. They brought the Constitutional fight to you.  You didn’t beg Twitter, a social media company, to treat your citizenship like a subjective matter and as a personal speech surveillance tool.

I think the messages from US media companies are pretty clear: US citizens don’t have any observable rights we need to care about.  They may as well be China, Russia or any other totalitarian regime on earth completely forfeited from the value of US Constitutional protections.  We all know there is no US Embassy in Cyberspace. 

Actions at Twitter now work to exclude naturalized US citizens from those who would have lawful protections under the US government.  Both Bush and Obama presidencies put unsecured access to mass surveillance ahead of domestic information security interests.  Trump, who is only informed by precedent, thinks readily some citizens are more protected than others.

When citizens aren’t really citizens in the United States for personal rights in protected speech and 4th Amendment limits, either we are not living in America or America isn’t really a Constitutional Republic with equal protections under the law.  In reality, both of these ideas are parasitic falsehoods hooked up by corrupt interests to siphon off resources of your labor, your money, your family and your freedom.

When a US soldier dies for US Constitutional freedoms and guaranteed rights, they don’t get to pick which citizens get the benefit of their sacrifice.  So no social media company should decide whose US citizenship rights and protections are denied. You are either a US citizen or you are not. If you are, it definitely means more than having someone parse your rights from a corrupt legal ivory tower in Silicon Valley.

So I scheduled deletion of all of my Twitter accounts.

Certain media denizens will decry it’s a “chilling effect”. They think far too much of global online services. Twitter only has the information power you give it. They need you to farm information.  If you stop giving them information, they will develop similar problems to Facebook's “news shortage”.  

US identity is only for approved use by the worthy.

###

View fullsize